With great image quality, impressive speed and powerful features, it's a compelling option that doesn't require a monthly subscription.Chances are, if you ask 100 photographers what they use to catalog and process their images, the Lightroom/Photoshop combo and Capture One will be the majority of people’s answers. Where ON1 Photo RAW packs an amazing array of tools into its interface, Exposure X5 is a little simpler and cleaner to use, and its preset effects are geared heavily towards photographers who want to recreate analog film effects, from the subtle and romantic to deep and dramatic.Exposure X6 is the latest Adobe Lightroom competitor from Exposure Software. Like ON1 Photo RAW, Exposure X5 is an all-in-one image organising, editing and effects tool, but while it covers much of the same territory, it’s quite different to use.
Exposure X Vs Lightroom License To Test
This software is so versatile that it can quickly be picked up.So you might as well ask whether to use Lightroom vs Photoshop, as this is also a bit strange comparison, because the apps are so different. What is Zoner Photo Studio X?You can also use it as a plug-in within Adobe Photoshop, or as an external editor for Lightroom. This won’t be a comprehensive review due to the length of a blog, but I’ll try to touch on each of the elements of the software that I noticed while I have been using it. Also, as a former Lightroom, now Capture One (and occasionally Photoshop) user, I’ll be drawing some comparisons to that software here. Luminar also features a much easier to use interface, than Lightroom, with one-click artificial intelligence that benefits professional photographers.Full disclosure: Until Zoner reached out to me and offered a year-long license to test it out and share my thoughts (no strings attached), I’d never heard of Zoner Photo Studio X, despite it having been around for well over a decade. Today, we’ll take a look at one of those options, Zoner Photo Studio X.Luminar vs Lightroom Which is Better in 2021 The main difference between Luminar and Lightroom is that Luminar has a faster editing process than Lightroom.
InterfaceThe moment you open ZPSX, you’ll be greeted with an interface that feels quite familiar. You can catalog, develop, liquify, and layout your images all within one application. Put simply, it is trying to be a jack-of-all-trades replacement for Lightroom, and the basic functionality of Photoshop and InDesign. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on WhatsApp Share on LinkedIn Share by Mail ZPSX is a raw developer, pixel editor, and basic design application all rolled into one. Exsposure-x3-vs-lightroom. Affinity Photo, so let us first explore a bit more on why the comparison is a bit strange, and then move on to an actual comparison between Affinity and Lightroom where it makes.
There is a browser on the left, a set of tools on the right, a filmstrip at the bottom, and a large viewer for you to work on the current image. The use of the DNG converter does produce a VERY flat starting point for your files, however, and Fujifilm’s film simulations are not available as profiles in this software.Once in the Develop section of ZPSX, everything is again familiar. Adobe also does a reasonable job of adding new cameras into their DNG converter, so you won’t have to worry about future support for new cameras. This additional step is not something we have come to expect from paid software suites, but it is only a one-time operation that can be forgotten afterwards. However, by installing Adobe’s DNG converter, the software can begin to load them for you to work with. Let’s look at what each of those offers.Black and White Image edited in Zoner Photo Studio X Raw DevelopmentZPSX does not natively support Fujifilm X-Trans files.
You need to click, make the adjustment, and then release the mouse button before it is applied. While this is okay for adjustments like contrast and exposure, it does make it difficult to judge the application of adjustments like clarity. The tools themselves feel a little more heavy-handed than I am used to (I use Capture One these days), so I definitely felt the need to back off my adjustments quite a bit more than I usually would.The other thing that I noticed while making adjustments is that the preview of the image blurs. All the usual suspects are available, such as exposure, white point, black point, HSL, sharpening, key-stoning, graduated and radial filters, and even an HDR panel that acts as a more aggressive and complex highlights/shadows tool. This could be a potential issue for users who work with large numbers of images, such as wedding or event photographers.After the image is loaded and ready for editing, the tools themselves are quite responsive (more so than Lightroom, but not quite on the level of Capture One).
This is a nice refined way of doing things for people who are particular about their noise reduction.Another useful tool to be found in ZPSX is a luma setting in the curves tool. Rather than applying the same noise reduction across the entire image, you can actually specify that it should be applied more in the shadows and less in the highlights for example. Having both options is great and can certainly help to get the exact colours you’re after.One more thing that really stood out to me was the noise reduction tool allowing tonal/colour noise reduction as a standard feature.
Pixel-level EditingThe Editor in ZPSX allows for basic Photoshop-style pixel-level work to be done. ZPSX doesn’t take the Fujifilm data into account, so most lens corrections actually need to be made manually. However, as we know, Fujifilm includes this data in their raw files and Adobe doesn’t provide profiles for all lenses. You can load these in manually if you have them available. Personally, I don’t ever go this deep into settings like this, but for those who like the detailed control this offers, it could be a handy tool.When it comes to Lens Correction, ZPSX makes use of the common Adobe LCP files. We also find different sharpening methods that can be selected to refine the type of sharpening to be applied.
I hope that tighter integration like this might be possible for ZPSX in the future.ZPSX is a piece of software that certainly has a lot to offer. They become two separate instances within the program. The data from the Editor is not saved alongside the raw development data, so you cannot flip back and forth between adjusting the raw file and having the cloning applied to your adjusted file. Perhaps the only downside to this integration is that cloning still needs to be the final step. Oftentimes that’s the only reason I’ll leave Capture One for Photoshop, so it’s nice to be able to do the cloning work in the same application. While these tools are not as advanced as those available in Adobe’s industry-leading Photoshop, they are certainly plenty for the average user to create interesting work within ZPSX.I found that the clone tools were the most useful in my case.
I personally enjoy the refinement of the more focussed tools I use such as Capture One and Photoshop. Since we don’t have space in a short blog like this to take a deep dive into each and every tool, you can check out a 30-day trial here.For me, ZPSX is not the sort of application that will become a part of my workflow. The combination of a raw development suite with pixel-level editing is quite interesting and that might be exactly what some users are looking for.
As I mentioned, there is a free trial and I definitely recommend giving ZPSX a run if you’re looking to shake up your software use. For those who perhaps don’t shoot a lot of images and want a simple way to catalog, backup, make simple adjustments, and then print a final product, ZPSX could be a good option to look at.
0 kommentar(er)
